Legal Opinion
Moorer v. Chastang
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided May 9, 1946No. 1 Div. 243PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STAKELY, Justice.
The bill in this suit was filed by Josephine Chastang and others against Monte L. Moorer in the form of a bill to quiet title to certain real estate situated in Mobile County, Alabama. The real purpose of the bill, as disclosed in its third paragraph, is to redeem from a tax sale under the provisions of § 296, Title 51, Code of 1940.
The allegations of the bill show in substance that complainants are in the peaceable possession of the lands, claiming to own them in their own right and that respondent claims some interest or title “by virtue of a tax sale thereof to the State…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Carter v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Kimbrell v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Cochran v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Tensaw Land & Timber Co. v. RiversSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- O'Rear v. O'RearSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Horn v. Dunn Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- O'CONNOR v. RabrenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Bobo v. Edwards Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Miles v. Bank of HeflinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Stallworth v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.