Bobo v. Edwards Realty Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, Justice.
The bill seeks to obtain the benefits of § 296, Title 51, Code 1940, sometimes referred to as a redemption. The question is whether or not the averment in the bill, that the redeeming-plaintiff is (when suit filed) the owner and in possession of the land, a sufficient allegation of possession to sustain the bill, when tested by demurrer.
Said § 296, in short, provides that when the suit (“for the recovery of real estate sold for the payment of taxes,” § 295) is against the taxpayer or any of his title successors named in the section, on motion of the defendant made at any time…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Seals v. Robinson & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Odom v. AverettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Tensaw Land & Timber Co. v. RiversSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Moorer v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Moorer v. ChastangSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ellis v. StickneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- Powell v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- O'CONNOR v. RabrenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Turnham v. PotterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Gallion v. GrahamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.