Legal Opinion

Bobo v. Edwards Realty Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 11, 1947No. 6 Div. 569PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice.

The bill seeks to obtain the benefits of § 296, Title 51, Code 1940, sometimes referred to as a redemption. The question is whether or not the averment in the bill, that the redeeming-plaintiff is (when suit filed) the owner and in possession of the land, a sufficient allegation of possession to sustain the bill, when tested by demurrer.

Said § 296, in short, provides that when the suit (“for the recovery of real estate sold for the payment of taxes,” § 295) is against the taxpayer or any of his title successors named in the section, on motion of the defendant made at any time…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Seals v. Robinson & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. Odom v. AverettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  3. Tensaw Land & Timber Co. v. RiversSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  4. Moorer v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  5. Moorer v. ChastangSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ellis v. StickneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  2. Powell v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  3. O'CONNOR v. RabrenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Turnham v. PotterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  5. State Ex Rel. Gallion v. GrahamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API