Legal Opinion

Ligran, Inc. v. Medlawtel, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 16, 1981PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

POLLOCK, J.

The primary issue in this case is when does a cause of action accrue against a person who is both the maker and the guarantor of payment of a promissory note. More specifically, where a promissory note is given as security for a lease, does the cause of action accrue at the time the note is issued or at the time the lease is breached? Inherent in this question is the problem of whether, as a matter of law, a maker can extend his or her liability by also signing as a guarantor of payment. We conclude that the resolution requires additional…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. First National Bank at BrownsvilleTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  2. American Trading Co. v. FishNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Rice v. Travelers Express Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  4. Union Bank v. DornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Rock Island Bank & Trust Co. v. StauduharAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Pritam SinghCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Consolidated Mortgage and Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  3. Santos v. First Nat'l State Bk. of NJNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  4. Seronick v. LEVY SCHONFELDMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  5. Cache National Bank v. LusherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API