Legal Opinion

Oleson v. Bergwell

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 10, 1939No. 31,881PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Defendant appeals from an order overruling his general demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint, the court having certified the questions presented thereby to be important and doubtful.

The action was brought to recover a claimed balance of $2,500 and interest upon a written contract, made and dated January 26, 1926. By the first paragraph thereof plaintiff’s assignor as “party of the first part agrees to sell to the party of the second part [defendant] and the party of the second part agrees to buy from the party of the first part 94 shares of capital stock of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith Stage Co. v. EckertArizona Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Ditzen v. GivenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  3. City of Minneapolis v. Republic Creosoting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. Osburn v. SmartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Gompert v. FrostSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Donnay v. BoulwareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. Pacific Gas and Electric Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  4. Egner v. States Realty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. Sandy v. Walter Butler Shipbuilders, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API