Legal Opinion

Sandy v. Walter Butler Shipbuilders, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 1, 1946No. 34,126PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Defendant appeals from an order overruling its demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint. The court having certified the question presented to be important and doubtful, the cause is properly here.

These, in substance, are the facts recited in the complaint:

Plaintiff, a qualified machinist, was employed as such by defendant at its Riverside plant in Duluth from August 1943 until and including December 24, 1944, at which time his services ended because of his having contracted a skin ailment, medically termed dermatitis, which compelled him to quit and to seek medical aid and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Markham v. CabellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Glodenis v. American Brass Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  3. Lelenko v. Wilson H. Lee Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  4. Lewis v. Connolly Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  5. Hunter v. Zenith Dredge Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nielsen v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. Lowry v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Todeva v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  4. Joyce v. Lewis Bolt & Nut Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Stepnowski v. Specific Pharmaceuticals, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API