Legal Opinion
In Re the Welfare of the Children of N.F.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 30, 2008No. A07-152PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
In 2005, S.F. disciplined his 12-year-old son, G.F., by paddling G.F. on the back of the upper thighs with moderate force a total of about 36 times. After a healing on stipulated facts and limited witness testimony, the district court adjudicated G.F. and his younger brother, C.F., to be in need of protection or services (CHIPS) under Minn.Stat. § 260C.007, subd. 6(2) (2006). The boys’ parents, S.F. and N.F., appealed. The court of appeals reversed the district court. Relying on the definition of “malicious prosecution of a child” under Minn.Stat. § 609.377, subd. 1…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- ILHC OF EAGAN, LLC v. County of DakotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. KoenigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Transport Leasing Corporation v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- State v. Industrial Tool & Die Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Hince v. O'KEEFESupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- U.S. Bank N. A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Troyer v. Vertlu Management Co./Kok & Lundberg Funeral HomesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Harstad v. City of WoodburyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Opheim v. County of NormanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- State of Minnesota v. Nathan Edward PalmerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.