Legal Opinion

Blumhagen v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 2000No. 99-191PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellant Craig Blumhagen appeals from his conviction on three counts of delivering cocaine.

We affirm.

ISSUES

Blumhagen presents the following issues on appeal:

Was the trial court's refusal to allow the only eyewitness to the events charged to be impeached error?

Was the trial court's decision to allow [the admission of] the fruits of a search of the defendant's new residence some five months after the events in question an abuse of discretion and was the admission of uncharged misconduct in violation of Rule 403 and Rule 404 of the Wyoming Rules of Evidence error?

Was Mr[.]…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Gayler v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Vigil v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Curl v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Dean v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Lancaster v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Duke v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Butcher v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Teniente v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Cazier v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API