Blumhagen v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MACY, Justice.
Appellant Craig Blumhagen appeals from his conviction on three counts of delivering cocaine.
We affirm.
ISSUES
Blumhagen presents the following issues on appeal:
Was the trial court's refusal to allow the only eyewitness to the events charged to be impeached error?
Was the trial court's decision to allow [the admission of] the fruits of a search of the defendant's new residence some five months after the events in question an abuse of discretion and was the admission of uncharged misconduct in violation of Rule 403 and Rule 404 of the Wyoming Rules of Evidence error?
Was Mr[.]…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Gayler v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Vigil v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Curl v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Dean v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Lancaster v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Duke v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Butcher v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Teniente v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Cazier v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.