Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Henderson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1947No. 32200PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYeager, J.

This was an action at its inception by George H. Schmidt, plaintiff, against Harold Henderson, defendant, in one cause of action. Later by amended and supplemental petition it became an action in three causes of action. It comes here in three causes of action. The first cause of action was for reformation of a lease, the second was for an accounting of rents, and the third on its face was for a writ of assistance in favor of plaintiff and.against the defendant. By title appearing on the transcript, the bill of exceptions, and the briefs, it appears as George H. Schmidt, plaintiff, v. Harold…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. MayerNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  3. Haeussler v. Missouri Iron Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  4. Sickler v. City of Broken BowNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Taylor v. ClarkNebraska Supreme Court · 1943

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Philip G. Johnson & Co. v. SalmenNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Rehn v. BingamanNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Corn Belt Products Company v. MullinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Gottsch Feeding Corp. v. Red Cloud Cattle Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Lustgarten v. JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API