Hubbard v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Thomas
Affirming.
Upon his trial in the Pike circuit court under a multifarious indictment charging him with all the offenses enumerated in our prohibition statute, commonly known as the “Rash-Grullion Act,” the appellant, Harmon Hubbard, was convicted of possessing intoxicating liquors. His motion for a new trial was overruled and from the judgment pronounced on the verdict he prosecutes this appeal. Upon a demurrer filed to the indictment the Commonwealth elected to prosecute him for possessing liquor, and the defect of multifariousness was thereby cured, under…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Neal v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- Abshire v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
3Cited by3 opinions
- Henson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
- Hudson and Walker v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Gilbert v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925