Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 30, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Thomas

Affirming.

Upon his trial in the Pike circuit court under a multifarious indictment charging him with all the offenses enumerated in our prohibition statute, commonly known as the “Rash-Grullion Act,” the appellant, Harmon Hubbard, was convicted of possessing intoxicating liquors. His motion for a new trial was overruled and from the judgment pronounced on the verdict he prosecutes this appeal. Upon a demurrer filed to the indictment the Commonwealth elected to prosecute him for possessing liquor, and the defect of multifariousness was thereby cured, under…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Neal v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  2. Abshire v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Henson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
  2. Hudson and Walker v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  3. Gilbert v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API