Legal Opinion

Hudson and Walker v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 7, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Settle

Affirming.

The appellants, Chester Hudson and Charles Walker, were jointly indicted and together tried in the court below for the offense of unlawfully, within twelve months before the filing of the indictment, manufacturing spirituous and intoxicating liquor, not for sacramental, medicinal, scientific or mechanical purposes. The trial resulted in a verdict by the jury finding each of the appellants guilty as charged and fixing the punishment of each at a fine of $300.00 and imprisonment of ninety days in jail, and from the judgment entered by the trial court…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bowling v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  2. Smith v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  3. King v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  4. Peters v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  5. Little v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Phoenix Amusement Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  2. West v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  3. Penix v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API