Sparks v. Metalcraft, Inc.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
LAVORATO, Justice.
The plaintiffs, Ronald B. Sparks and Ruth Sparks, appeal from a summary judgment ruling dismissing their causes of action against Metalcraft, Inc. (Metalcraft) for injuries allegedly sustained by Ronald while working with solvents and tags manufactured by Metalcraft. Ruth’s action is for loss of spousal consortium. The summary judgment disposed of the actions on the basis of the statute of limitations. A cause of action based on violation of the Federal Hazardous Substances Act (FHSA), 15 U.S.C.A. sections 1261-1276 (West Supp.1986), was dismissed earlier by the court as was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Chrischilles v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- Burd v. New Jersey Telephone CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Franzen v. Deere and Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Childs v. HausseckerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- State of Iowa v. Eddie TiptonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Pennwalt Corp. v. NasiosCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Curtis v. Universal Match Corp.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1991
- Kendall/Hunt Publishing Co. v. RoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.