Legal Opinion
Curtis v. Universal Match Corp.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided September 27, 1991No. CIV-1-89-280PublishedCited by 99 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDGAR, District Judge.
This is a products liability action in which the Court’s diversity jurisdiction has been invoked under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The matter presently before the Court is a motion by defendants Universal Match Corporation, Inc. (“Universal Match”) and Feudor S.A. (“Feudor”) for summary judgment. (Court File No. 66). After carefully reviewing the record and the applicable law, the Court concludes that the motion will be GRANTED.
I. Standard of Review
Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c) provides that summary judgment shall be rendered if there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- 60 Ivy Street Corporation (86-5500), and Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc., (86-5517) v. R.C. Alexander and Doris AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Woodrow Sterling v. Velsicol Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- Sigler v. American Honda Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Calles v. Scripto-Tokai Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2007
- Hernandez Ex Rel. Emeterio v. Tokai Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
- Coffey v. Dowley Manufacturing, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2002
- Welch v. Scripto-Tokai Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.