MacDonald v. De Fremery
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This action was brought to recover damages for deceit. The complaint charged that plaintiff was induced through the false representations of defendants to purchase stock of the Union National Bank of Oakland at a gross over-valuation, whereby plaintiff sustained damages in the sum of thirty-seven thousand four hundred dollars, alleged to be the difference between the price paid for the stock and its actual value at the times of purchase. The defendants were respectively president, first vice-president, and second vice-president of the Union National Bank. Defendant de Fremery died before the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Yates v. Jones National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Spreckels v. GorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Hindman v. First Nat. Bank of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
- The Edward Barron Estate Co. v. the Woodruff Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Thomas v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Anderson v. ThacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Carpenter v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Dyke v. ZaiserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Carr v. Sacramento Clay Products Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.