Taylor v. Darling
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco denying the motion of defendant, made after judgment for the plaintiff, to vacate the same. Franklin J. Cole, Judge Presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
This is an appeal from an order made after final judgment, denying defendant’s motion made under sections 663 arid 663a of the Code of Civil Procedure, to vacate and set aside the judgment rendered and entered against defendant as not supported by the facts found.
1. The contention of respondent that such order is not appealable is fully answered by the cases of Bond v. United Railroads, 159 Cal. 270, [Ann. Cas. 1912C, 50, 113 Pac. 366], Condon v. Donahue, 160 Cal. 749, [118 Pac. 113], and Rahmel v. Lehndorff, 142 Cal. 681, [100 Am. St. Rep. 154, 65 L. R. A. 88, 76 Pac. 659]. The order denying…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bond v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Rahmel v. LehndorffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Condon v. DonohueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Bogart v. WoodruffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- McDonald v. PorshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by2 opinions
- Horsburgh v. MuraskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Taylor v. DarlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913