Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Darling

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1913No. Civ. No. 1234PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This case was heard in this court before, (Taylor v. Darling, 17 Cal. App. 232, [125 Pac. 249]). Plaintiff sued the defendant for the conversion of certain personal property. Defendant in her answer, in addition to denying the material allegations of the complaint, set forth that she was a married woman not living separate and apart from her husband, and that her husband had not been made a party defendant to the action. The court found this allegation of the answer to be true, but nevertheless gave judgment against the defendant as prayed for in the complaint. On appeal to this court the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gray v. DoughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Schaake v. Eagle Automatic Can Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Buckley v. HoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Saddlemire v. Stockton Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Scott v. BurtonTexas Supreme Court · 1851

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shore v. ShoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Shore v. ShoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API