Legal Opinion

Magana v. Hyundai Motor America

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 30, 2007No. 34630-3-IIPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Van Deren, A.C.J.

¶1 Hyundai Motor Company and Hyundai Motor America (collectively Hyundai) appeal the trial court’s default order of liability on Jesse Magana’s personal injury claim due to Hyundai’s willful discovery violations. It argues that the trial court erred (1) in finding that it willfully violated discovery orders, (2) by failing to consider lesser sanctions, and (3) by not requiring evidence of prejudice warranting the default sanction. It also challenges the trial court’s award of interest from the date of the jury verdict on the underlying and unchallenged damages award. Finding…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Prier v. Refrigeration Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Burnet v. Spokane AmbulanceWashington Supreme Court · 1997

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Magana v. Hyundai Motor AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. GMAC v. Everett Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Magaña v. Hyundai Motor AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Deutscher v. GabelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Air Serv Corporation v. Flight Services & Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API