Handiboe v. McCarthy
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Fkankum, Judge.
1. “An implied invitation is one which is held to be extended by reason of the owner doing something or permitting something to be done which fairly indicates to the person entering that his entry and use of the property is consistent with the intents and purposes of the owner. Smith v. Jewell Cotton Mill Co., 29 Ga. App. 461 (116 SE 17). An invitation is implied where the entry on the premises is for a purpose which is, or is supposed to be, beneficial to the owner. Crossgrove v. Atlantic C. L. R. Co., 30 Ga. App. 462 (118 SE 694). A person is an invitee where, for purposes…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Thomas v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Crossgrove v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Coffer v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Cook v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. WestSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984
- Ember v. B.F.D., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Farwell v. KeatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Cechman v. TravisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Laite v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.