Fixico v. Chapman

The plaintiff in error, as plaintiff below, sought to be adjudged the owner of an undivided one-fourth interest in lands situated in Hughes county and described as the south half of the northeast quarter of section 25, township 8 north, range 8 east.

The described lands constituted the allotment of Cozar Fixieo. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant was in possession of the lands in controversy and had derived his title from Maley Fixieo, John Davis, and Nupsey Fixieo, widow, son and daughter respectively of Cozar Fixieo. The plaintiff alleged that he was the son of Cozar Fixieo and Pagee,…