Legal Opinion

Norton v. Larney

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 25, 1923No. 6164PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOTH, District Judge.

This is a suit to quiet title to certain land in appellee (plaintiff below), to cancel a deed of the land made by some of the defendants to the defendant Norton, and to enjoin defendants from asserting any claim against plaintiff to the land. Upon the trial decree was entered for plaintiff.

In this court, for the first time, appellant challenges the jurisdiction of the court below. Nevertheless it is the duty of this court to consider the question of jurisdiction as in every case, and whether raised by the parties or not. C., B. & Q. R. R. Co. v. Willard, 220 U. S. 413,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Taylor v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Shulthis v. McDougalSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Robertson v. CeaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. WillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Norton v. LarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Elliott v. Empire Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  3. Jefferson v. Gypsy Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  4. Mathers & Mathers v. UrschelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  5. Harris v. Capehart-Farnsworth Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API