Legal Opinion

Chaney v. Fields Chevrolet Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1971PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

This is an action for damages as the result of an alleged scheme to “cheat, swindle and defraud” plaintiff out of money due him upon the repossession and resale of a truck previously purchased by plaintiff from defendant. The plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant entered on a directed verdict.

Plaintiff filed an original and three amended complaints. In granting the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict, the trial court held (1) that the plaintiff’s original complaint was founded on breach of contract; (2) that the amended complaints changed plaintiff’s theory to a tort action…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pakos v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Musgrave Et Ux. v. Lucas Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Edwards, Guardian v. HoevetOregon Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Forest Grove Brick Works, Inc. v. StricklandOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Chaney v. Fields Chevrolet Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Carte v. Flury Buick-Jeep, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Ruegsegger v. McCarleyOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Judson v. Terry Morgan Construction, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API