Legal Opinion

State v. Holloway

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1988No. 86-1597PublishedCited by 212 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

This appeal presents us with six propositions of law asserting various errors in the penalty phase of the trial and appellate court proceedings.

I

A

Holloway first asserts that his premature release from prison precipitated his violent behavior. He submits that the trial court failed to properly consider his early release as a mitigating factor in sentencing, rendering this sentencing constitutionally deficient under Lockett v. Ohio (1978), 438 U.S. 586, applied in State v. Jenkins (1984), 15 Ohio St. 3d 164, at 189, 15 OBR 311, at 332-333, 473 N.E. 2d 264, at 288-289, and flawed in light of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. State v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. LytleOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by212 opinions

  1. State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. XieOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. GarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 2001

207 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API