Legal Opinion

Gutansky v. Advance Mortgage Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 3, 1981No. 80-2905PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE ROMITI

delivered the opinion of the court:

The plaintiffs attempted to bring a class action to recover statutory penalties for failure to release a mortgage within the 30 days required by law. The court refused to certify the class action; plaintiffs were granted judgment on their individual claim. The plaintiffs have appealed the denial of certification. We affirm.

Section 2 of “An Act relating to mortgages of property of public utilities” (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 95, par. 52) provides in part:

“Every mortgagee of real property, his assignee of record, or other legal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Steinberg v. Chicago Medical SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Miner v. Gillette Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Brooks v. Midas-International Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. McCabe v. BurgessIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Wilson v. All-Steel, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re Consol. Mtge. Satisfaction CasesOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. McCarthy v. La Salle National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. McCarthy v. LaSALLE NAT. BANK & TRUST CO.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. In Re RosewellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  5. Wenthold v. AT & T TECHNOLOGIES, INC.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API