Legal Opinion

Pemberton v. Bennett

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1963PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The defendants admitted liability and plaintiff recovered a verdict in a personal injury action in the sum of $1,731.55. Plaintiff alleges that she suffered serious injuries and in her complaint she prayed for $45,000 general damages and $1,231.55 special damages. Plaintiff has appealed from the verdict.

Plaintiff assigns as error the trial court’s granting of defendants’ motion to require plaintiff to be physically examined by a physician selected by the defendants oiit of the presence of plaintiff’s attorney. Defendants’ motion was accompanied by an affidavit. It recited that it had been…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carnine v. TibbettsOregon Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lindell v. KaluginOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Langfeldt-Haaland v. Saupe Enterprises, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Simon v. CastilleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Hayes v. District Court Ex Rel. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  5. Whanger v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API