St. Clair v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
This is a writ of error to review a judgment of conviction under section 215 of the Penal Code (18 USCA § 338), commonly known as the mail fraud statute. The indictment charged the devising of a scheme and artifice for obtaining money and property by means of false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, in the usual form, and the mailing of certain letters for the purpose of executing the scheme and artifice. It also contained the usual conspiracy count, but as to this the jury returned a verdict of not guilty. The facts material to a proper…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. River Rouge Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
- Scott v. AbbottCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- State ex rel. Range v. HinkleWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Walker v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- John Milton Phillips, Jr., Jack Cecil Cherbo and Richard Dale Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Lonergan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- (HC) Carroll v. Warden, USP-AtwaterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Allison v. The Employees of Stien HospitalDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022
- John Milton Phillips, Jr., Jack Cecil Cherbo and Richard Dale Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966