Legal Opinion

Harris v. Graham

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 2, 1926No. 16211Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

RILEY, J.

Upon the filing of additional briefs and after an oral argument, a rehearing has been granted in this cause, and the same is now upon the merits.

It is conceded that plaintiff below is entitled to a judgment in the sum of $125, for money expended in the purchase of the so-called “oil of radium.” It is evident that the defendant below held himself out to be ■a physician. In his answer it is pleaded:

“Defendant admits that he is a physician, and that plaintiff came to him for treatment and that he diagnosed her case, and gave her proper treatment and directions, but says…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Hansen v. KemmishSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  3. In Re Disbarment of ChitwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Lafayette v. BassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Feige v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API