Harris v. Graham
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion
On Rehearing.
RILEY, J.
Upon the filing of additional briefs and after an oral argument, a rehearing has been granted in this cause, and the same is now upon the merits.
It is conceded that plaintiff below is entitled to a judgment in the sum of $125, for money expended in the purchase of the so-called “oil of radium.” It is evident that the defendant below held himself out to be ■a physician. In his answer it is pleaded:
“Defendant admits that he is a physician, and that plaintiff came to him for treatment and that he diagnosed her case, and gave her proper treatment and directions, but says…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hobbs v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Hansen v. KemmishSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- In Re Disbarment of ChitwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Lafayette v. BassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Feige v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914