Feige v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Appeal from County Court, Oklahoma County; John W. Hayson, Judge. Karl Feige was convicted of practicing medicine without lawful authority, and appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.
The plaintiff in error, Karl Feige, was tried and convicted at the September, 1912, term of the county court of Oklahoma county on a charge of practicing medicine without having first procured a proper certificate as provided by law, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $225.
The only question worthy of consideration in this case is the assignment based upon the contention that the court erred in overruling the motion in arrest of judgment. The motion in arrest was founded upon the contention that the information upon which the prosecution is based does not state facts sufficient to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Douglas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
- Barfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
- Morrison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
- Harris v. GrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926