Vasquez v. Potter & Co.

On this appeal, the plaintiff argues that the trial judge erred in denying his motion to amend the complaint for a second time and in allowing the defendanf s motion for summary judgment. In his first amended complaint, the plaintiff alleged that he hired the corporate defendant and defendant Woodrow W. Potter, Jr., individually, to prepare his personal and business tax returns for the 1999 and 2000 tax years, and that the defendant2 revealed the contents of those tax records in violation of G.L.C. 112, §87E and in violation of its fiduciary duty to the plaintiff. The plaintiff sought damages…