Legal Opinion

State v. Pare

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 11, 2003No. AC 23066PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FOTI, J.

The defendant, Joseph Pare, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of murder in violation of General Statutes § SSa-bJa.1 On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) allowed evidence of a prior statement by the defendant, which was contained in his medical records, for purposes of impeachment, (2) instructed the jury on reasonable doubt and (3) instructed the jury on the presumption of innocence. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. The defendant, who had a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. WhipperSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  2. State v. CopasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  3. State v. PareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  4. State v. DelvalleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  5. State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. EstrellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  2. State v. Bennett-GibsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  3. State v. LopesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  4. State v. CiccioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  5. State v. GriffinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API