Dutch Point Credit Union, Inc. v. Caron Auto Works, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s judgment for the defendants1 regarding the *125sale of a motor vehicle pursuant to General Statutes § 14-150. The plaintiff claims on appeal that the trial court improperly (1) determined that § 14-150 satisfies constitutional guarantees of due process of law, and (2) denied its claim for damages.
The plaintiff was the first lienholder of record on an automobile owned by Elizabeth Oree. After the vehicle was involved in an accident in Manchester and at the request of the Manchester police department, the defendant Caron Motors, Inc. (Caron Motors),…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Richard Stypmann v. The City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Perlstein v. WolkIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
- Giordano v. GiordanoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Lawson v. Whitey's Frame ShopConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. New York City Police DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Associates Financial Services of America, Inc. v. SorensenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.