Legal Opinion
Zakre v. Norddeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 2, 2005No. 03 Civ.0257 RWSPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Norddeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale (“Nord/LB”, the “Bank” or the “Defendant”) has moved under Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff Beverly Zakre (“Zakre” or the “Plaintiff’) alleging that Nord/LB discriminated and retaliated against her in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., the New York State Human Rights Law, Executive Law § 296 et seq., and the Administrative Code of the City of New York § 8-107 et seq., and to strike certain allegations from the affidavits of Zakre,…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pineda v. Masonry Construction, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Ellis v. Century 21 Department StoresDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Serrano v. Cablevision Systems Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Attenborough v. Construction & General Building Laborers' Local 79District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Lopes v. Caffe Centrale LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.