Legal Opinion

California Highway Commission v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 7, 1923No. Civ. No. 4430PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.

This matter is before us upon a writ to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission against petitioner, allowing to Harry Maloney $248.70, accrued compensation and $18.52 weekly until termination of disability, together with reasonable medical expenses, the amount to be determined later by said commission.

The one question presented is whether or not the finding of the commission that applicant sustained his injuries “in the course of and arising out of his employment” is sustained by the evidence in the record.

The facts are practically undisputed and are, broadly, as follows: On…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. N. K. Fairbank Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  2. California C. I. Exch. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Ocean Acc. Etc. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Dominguez v. PendolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. In re BettsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Walker v. HydeIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Western Pipe & Steel Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. California Casualty Indemnity Exchange v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Trussless Roof Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API