Legal Opinion

Fetterman v. Bingham

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1926No. 19480PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

The paramount question in this case is whether under the will of Charles Johnson it was the intention of the testator that, upon the performance of certain conditions named in the will, the interest of Yernon B. Fetterman in the land in question ceased when he became 21 years of age and testator’s daughter, Electa A. Bingham, was still living.

The testamentary plan in the mind of the testator seems to have been first to care for those that were of his own blood, to-wit, his daughter, Electa A. Bingham, and her “natural heirs,” which latter expression, as used in this will, we are of opinion…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Colby v. . DotyNew York Court of Appeals · 1899

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Avery v. Avery, Admx.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1958
  2. Gaston v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Cleveland v. ThorntonOhio Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. Conn v. Catholic Slovak UnionOhio Court of Appeals · 1927
  5. Kohout v. KohoutCuyahoga County Probate Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API