Legal Opinion

Gaston v. Moore

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 1, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

This case is here both on appeal and error.

The original action below was brought by the plaintiff, Elizabeth B. Moore, widow of Hugh M. Moore, to sell real estate claimed to be the property of Hugh M. Moore, plaintiff’s decedent, to pay debts of said estate.

The petition sought to sell two tracts, designated tract 1 and tract 2. There was no contest over the right of the plaintiff to sell tract 2, and it was sold and the proceeds distributed. The controversy is over the ownership of tract L

The plaintiff alleged in her petition that her decedent, Hugh M. Moore, died seized in fee simple of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ebey v. AdamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Blackstone v. AlthouseIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Fetterman v. BinghamOhio Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Orendorf v. Fayette Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
  2. Hollister v. Witherbee, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API