Conn v. Catholic Slovak Union
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BY THE COURT
This action was brought by the Superintendent of Insurance, and the purpose of the action was ’to compel the defendant to show *565cause why the company should not be ousted from the transaction of its business in Ohio and its affairs liquidated.
Attorneys — Edward C. Turner, Atty. Gen. and C. F. Younger, for Conn; Wilson & Rector, for Union; all of Columbus.
The defendant demurs to the petition and the demurrer is supported upon two grounds:— first, that the court has no original jurisdiction because the action is not in quo warranto, second, that the court has no jurisdiction on…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fetterman v. BinghamOhio Supreme Court · 1926