Legal Opinion
Neal v. Reliance Electric & Engineering Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided August 31, 1967No. 3103PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrawford, P.J.
This case is before the court for a second time. We previously held that plaintiffs-appellants had stated a cause of action for declaratory judgment sufficient against demurrer, Neal v. Reliance Electric and Engineering Co. (1963), 118 Ohio App. 501.
As former employees of the defendant corporation, plaintiffs brought this as a class action to determine their rights under collective bargaining agreements made on their behalf by the local labor union of which they were members. The issues arise from the employer’s moving its entire operation to a new plant in Columbus, Indiana.
The principal…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Smith v. Evening News Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Humphrey v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Local 1251 International Union Of United Automobile, Aircraft And Agricultural Implement Workers Of America Uaw v. Robertshaw Controls CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Rutledge v. Dayton Malleable, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
- Finocchi v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit AuthorityOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Holbrook v. Dana Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1980
- Local 1251 International Union of United Automobile Workers v. Robertshaw Controls Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.