Legal Opinion
Finocchi v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 16, 1993No. 61650PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Krupansky, Judge.
This cause of action was commenced by filing a complaint in the common pleas court on March 31, 1989. The appeal sub judice stems from an order of the trial court dated March 18, 1991 granting summary judgment against plaintiffs-appellants, eight union transit employees, in favor of their employer, defendantappellee Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority (“GCRTA”).
GCRTA acquired substantially all the assets of the city of Shaker Heights Rapid Transit System and continued thereafter to operate the rail transit system with its existing union employees as a going concern.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jackson Transit Authority v. Local Division 1285, Amalgamated Transit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Helle v. Landmark, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
- Dayton Classroom Teachers Ass'n v. Dayton Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Campbell v. Hospitality Motor Inns, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
- Local Division 589, Amalgamated Transit Union, Afl-Cio, Clc v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Local Division 589, Amalgamated Transit Union, Afl-Cio v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Local Division 589, Amalgamated Transit Union, Afl-Cio v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Amalgamated Transit Union, AFL-CIO, Local 697 v. Toledo Area Regional Transit Auth.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Amalgamated Transit Union Local 268 v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Auth.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020