Alan E. Davis v. United States of America, Lt. Col. R. E. Stoffey
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Circuit Judge:
Alan E. Davis brought this action under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680, against the United States and Lt. Col. R. E. Stoffey, Davis’s commanding officer in the Marine Corps. Davis sought damages for alleged intentional misuse of General Court-Martial proceedings. The district court dismissed, holding that the action was barred by the doctrine developed in Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135, 71 S.Ct. 153, 95 L.Ed. 152 (1950). Because Feres applies to Davis’s intentional tort claim against the Government, and because the district court…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Moore v. BrewsterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Linda Marie Zambrano, and Jose E. Tafolla, Esq. Philip W. Orr, Esq., Claimants-Appellants v. City of Tustin David KreylingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Freddie L. Johnson and Clara Johnson, Husband and Wife, and Cross v. United States of America, and Cross-Appellee v. Timothy B. Hay, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Joseph Herbert Mars v. Jack A. HanberryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Sheet Metal Workers' International Association Local Union No. 359 v. Madison Industries, Inc., of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.