Gandelman v. Mercantile Ins.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
HARRISON, District Judge.
Plaintiff sues the two defendant insurance companies to recover under fire insurance policies prepared by each of them. The real issues are whether any liability was created under the policies by their preparation without 1he knowledge and consent of the plaintiff, preparatory to a substitution of the policies in place of an existing policy, or by their delivery to the plaintiff after the loss.
*474After a mistrial both plaintiff and defendants made motions for a summary judgment and the same have been submitted to me for determination. The motions have been submitted…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Yoder v. Nu-Enamel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- Law v. Northern Assurance Co. of LondonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Ferrar v. Western Assurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1916
- K. C. Working Chemical Co. v. Eureka-Security Fire & Marine InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jacques Arley and Charlotte Arley, Husband and Wife v. United Pacific Insurance Company, a Washington CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Ness v. National Indemnity Company of NebraskaDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1965