Legal Opinion

Geryk v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 5, 1989No. 7003PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is the defendants’ appeal, after a jury trial, in an action for personal injuries sustained in a motor vehicle collision.1 The jury returned , a $10,000 verdict in favor of the plaintiff Edmund Lulewicz. The trial court set aside that verdict as inadequate and ordered a new trial limited to the issue of damages unless the parties agreed to an additur of $193,000. The defendants declined to agree and appealed seeking to have the jury’s verdict reinstated, or, in the alternative, a new trial on the issue of liability as well as damages. We find error.

The jury could reasonably have found…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Palomba v. GraySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Josephson v. MeyersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. State v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Creem v. CiceroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  5. Gold v. University of Bridgeport School of LawConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Donahue v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  2. Adams v. Krzystofik, No. Cv 86 008 76 S (Jan. 27, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992
  3. Coerbell v. McCain Transport, Inc., No. Cv 89 0356766 (Sep. 23, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992
  4. Fennell v. City of Hartford, No. Cv 89 0370923 (May 1, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
  5. Geryk v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API