Geryk v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
This is the defendants’ appeal, after a jury trial, in an action for personal injuries sustained in a motor vehicle collision.1 The jury returned , a $10,000 verdict in favor of the plaintiff Edmund Lulewicz. The trial court set aside that verdict as inadequate and ordered a new trial limited to the issue of damages unless the parties agreed to an additur of $193,000. The defendants declined to agree and appealed seeking to have the jury’s verdict reinstated, or, in the alternative, a new trial on the issue of liability as well as damages. We find error.
The jury could reasonably have found…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Palomba v. GraySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Josephson v. MeyersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Creem v. CiceroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Gold v. University of Bridgeport School of LawConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Donahue v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Adams v. Krzystofik, No. Cv 86 008 76 S (Jan. 27, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992
- Coerbell v. McCain Transport, Inc., No. Cv 89 0356766 (Sep. 23, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992
- Fennell v. City of Hartford, No. Cv 89 0370923 (May 1, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
- Geryk v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.