Legal Opinion

Ray v. Dooley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 11, 1952No. 17778PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hawkins, Justice.

1. “Courts of equity will not interfere with the regular course of an administration, by appointing a receiver to take the assets of the estate out of the hands of the administrator, unless the danger be imminent, and the charges in the bill be positive and specific.” Powell v. Quinn, 49 Ga. 523; Hamrick v. Hamrick, 206 Ga. 564 (58 S. E. 2d, 145); Ware v. Martin, 207 Ga. 512 (63 S. E. 2d, 335). Butt where, as in this case, an equitable petition is brought by one alleging herself to be the common-law wife of the deceased, and by two others alleged to be the children of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Campbell v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  2. Brown v. ParksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  3. Beavers v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  4. Hoyt v. WareSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  5. Gearllach v. OdomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Evans v. LittleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  3. Bryant v. BryantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
  4. Lovett v. ZeiglerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  5. Marlowe v. MossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API