Legal Opinion

Habbe v. Viele

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1897No. 18,009PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From, the Vanderburgh Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.

This was an action brought by appellee to reform a lease given by her to appellant for a double store room in the city of Evansville. The court found for appellee and entered a decree reforming the lease as prayed for. It is contended that the evidence does not support the finding.

Appellee does not discuss the question raised in appellant’s brief, but contents herself with saying that there is evidence in the record to support the finding. She does contend, however, that the appeal is not properly before the court, for the reason that the motion for a new trial in the court below was not…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stockbridge Iron Co. v. Hudson Iron Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. Citizens' National Bank v. JudyIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. StickIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Evansville & Richmond Railroad v. MadduxIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Pryce v. StatlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Estate of Reasor v. Putnam CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Wright v. BertiauxIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Givan v. MastersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. United States Cement Co. v. WhittedIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. Bucyrus Co. v. TownsendIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API