Legal Opinion

United States Cement Co. v. Whitted

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 1910No. 6,746PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Prom Lawrence Circuit Court; James B. Wilson, Judge. Action by Harley Whitted, by his next friend, against the United States Cement Company. Prom a judgment on a verdict for plaintiff for $1,200, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRabb, P. J.

Appellant is engaged in the manufacture of cement, and for this purpose maintains an extensive plant, comprising a number of buildings and a certain extent of grounds surrounding them. Among other buildings is one in which kilns are built, and in which the material out of which cement is manufactured is burned, and on the grouAds about this building is a pool or ditch, which on the occasion giving rise to this action was filled with hot water. No provision for heating the kiln building was made by appellant, other than the fire in the kilns.

Appellee was engaged in the service of appellant, at…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Ruppert v. . Brooklyn Heights R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Asbach v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  4. Smith v. First National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  5. Atlas Engine Works v. RandallIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rhoades v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
  2. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. Garvin, Rec. v. Chadwick Realty Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Hovedsgaard v. Grand Rapids Store Equipment Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. PeckIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API