Legal Opinion

Bucyrus Co. v. Townsend

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 1917No. 10,033PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Industrial Board of Indiana. Proceedings for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act by Daisy Townsend and others against the Bucyrus Company. From an award for applicant, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtIbach, P. J.

Appellees’ husband and father was an employe of appellant company, and while so employed it is claimed he received a serious personal injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment, from which he died on August 8, 1916. On February 3, 1917, appellees, as dependents of decedent, filed their verified application before the Industrial Board for an adjustment of their claim for compensation, which was granted, and they were awarded $7.29 per week for 300 weeks.

1. It is contended by appellant that the award of the full board is not sustained by sufficient evidence and is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Union Sanitary Manufacturing Co. v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Bayne v. Riverside Storage & Cartage Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Columbia School Supply Co. v. LewisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Habbe v. VieleIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Leppert v. Vandalia RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Edge v. City of PierreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Indiana Power & Water Co. v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. WaldonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. Noble County Highway Department v. SorgenfreiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Victor Oolitic Stone Co. v. CriderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API