Legal Opinion

Gorowitz v. Blumenstein

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1944PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.

The plaintiff, on April 28, 1933, loaned the sum of $7,500 to the defendant, upon the execution by him of a promissory note in that sum, payable one year from date. This note was delivered simultaneously with and subject to an agreement of the same date which defined the rights and obligations of the parties thereto. On his part, plaintiff covenanted to extend the note “ for a further date, giving the party of the first part [defendant] an opportunity to pay the said obligation ” in the event it was not paid on its due date, and further agreed that he would not “ unreasonably and unfairly…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Shapley v. . AbbottNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Parchen v. ChessmanMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Brownrigg v. DefreesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Bridges v. StephensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  5. Moxley v. RaganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1873

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Waugh v. LennardArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Erbe v. Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  3. United States v. Curtiss Aeroplane Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  4. State v. Hart Motor Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  5. Shohfi v. ShohfiNew York Court of Appeals · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API