Legal Opinion

United States v. Curtiss Aeroplane Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 8, 1945No. 24PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment dismissing its complaint, because it was barred by the Statute of Limitations. The facts are as follows: Between September 25, 1914, and February 25, 1915, the Russian Imperial Government made seven written contracts with a corporation known as the Curtiss Aeroplane Company, for the manufacture and delivery of forty-eight “K boats,” and two transatlantic “flying boats.” (The other defendants have succeeded to the liabilities *640of the Curtiss Aeroplane Company, hut for simplicity we shall disregard them, and dispose of the case…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Chamberlain v. . ChamberlainNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Shapley v. . AbbottNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  3. Connecticut Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. WeadNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Woods v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. In Re PovillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hunter-Boykin v. George Washington UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  2. United Fruit Company v. J. A. Folger & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  3. Saleh Holdings Group, Inc. v. Dreier (In Re Dreier LLP)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  4. Hoague-Sprague Corp. v. Bird & Son, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
  5. Hunter-Boykin v. George Washington UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API