United States v. Curtiss Aeroplane Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment dismissing its complaint, because it was barred by the Statute of Limitations. The facts are as follows: Between September 25, 1914, and February 25, 1915, the Russian Imperial Government made seven written contracts with a corporation known as the Curtiss Aeroplane Company, for the manufacture and delivery of forty-eight “K boats,” and two transatlantic “flying boats.” (The other defendants have succeeded to the liabilities *640of the Curtiss Aeroplane Company, hut for simplicity we shall disregard them, and dispose of the case…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Chamberlain v. . ChamberlainNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Shapley v. . AbbottNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Connecticut Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. WeadNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Woods v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- In Re PovillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hunter-Boykin v. George Washington UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- United Fruit Company v. J. A. Folger & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Saleh Holdings Group, Inc. v. Dreier (In Re Dreier LLP)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Hoague-Sprague Corp. v. Bird & Son, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- Hunter-Boykin v. George Washington UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.