Legal Opinion

Boe v. Healy

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1969No. File 10460PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOMEYER, Judge.

*157Plaintiff, Nancy Boe, was a tenant in a duplex owned by the defendant, James Healy, and in this action seeks to recover from him damages for the loss of her personal property as the result of a fire. A jury found in her favor. Defendant's motions for directed verdict, and for judgment notwithstanding verdict and, in the alternative, for a new trial were denied and he appeals. Error is assigned in (1) the denial of such motions, and (2) in instructions.

The duplex was a two-story frame building with an upstairs apartment, a ground floor apartment, a front and rear porch,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Reardon v. ShimelmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  2. Morris v. King Cole Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  3. Stupka v. ScheidelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  4. Henry v. the First Nat'l Bk. of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. Wiggins v. Pay's Art StoreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Kunkel v. United Security Ins. Co. of New JerseySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Fritz v. Howard TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Hendrix v. SchulteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Clauson v. KempfferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Davies v. Gphc, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API