Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 5, 1971No. 181-2PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

This case involves the obligation of a father to furnish support to an adult son as long as he attends college as a full-time student. The rights and obligations in question arise from a property settlement agreement incorporated into a divorce decree. That portion of the settlement agreement which is disputed reads as follows:

The plaintiff [husband] agrees to pay to the defendant [wife], as Trustee for Mackey F. Smith, the sum of $150.00 per month, for his support, education and maintenance, for each and every calendar month or any portion thereof, in which the said Mackey F. Smith attends…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Buyken v. ErtnerWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Sutherland v. SutherlandWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Dawson v. DawsonWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Cahalan Investment Co. v. Yakima Central Heating Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Keeter v. John Griffith, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hall v. Add-Ventures, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Carpenter v. FolkertsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  3. Riser v. RiserCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  4. KWIK-LOK CORPORATION v. PulseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  5. Pepper & Tanner, Inc. v. KEDO, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API