Legal Opinion

Yanow v. Seven Oaks Park, Inc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 20, 1951PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

15 N.J. Super. 73 (1951)

83 A.2d 28

SAMUEL YANOW, RESHELA YANOW, ABRAHAM G. HOROWITZ AND RUTH S. HOROWITZ, PLAINTIFFS,

v.

SEVEN OAKS PARK, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, MAX MASIN, MORRIS TZESES, SEYMOUR MASIN, LEO MASIN, LEO TZESES, ARTHUR TZESES AND MILTON ALBERT, DEFENDANTS, AND EASTERN CHRISTIAN INSTITUTE, INTERVENING DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided July 20, 1951.

Mr. Samuel S. Ferster, attorney for plaintiffs.

Messrs. Kristeller & Zucker, attorneys for all the defendants other than Eastern Christian Institute.

Messrs. McGlynn, Weintraub & Stein, attorneys for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. MAYOR, & C., OF ALPINE BOROUGH v. BrewsterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  2. Stokes v. JenkinsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  3. Srager v. MintzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
  4. Dinkins v. KipNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dolan v. DeCapuaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  2. Looman Realty Corp. v. BROAD ST. NAT. BK., TRENTONNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  3. Wright v. DeFattaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
  4. Trenkamp v. Township of BurlingtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  5. PEOPLE FOR OPEN GOVERNMENT v. RobertsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API