Dinkins v. Kip
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
Berry, V. C.
The complainants in the above stated causes are property owners in the town of Montclair. The complainant Dinkins owns property adjoining that of the defendants and the complainant Ellis owns property on Myrtle avenue in Montclair, and opposite, or nearly so, to that owned by the defendants. The material allegations in the two bills of complaint are so nearly identical as to require but one statement. These allegations are to the effect that on May 10th, 1921, the town of Montclair adopted a zoning ordinance by the terms of which the defendants’ property was placed in what is…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Welton v. 40 East Oak St. Bldg. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
- Schultze v. WilsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- Yanow v. Seven Oaks Park, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951