Legal Opinion

Dinkins v. Kip

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 14, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Berry, V. C.

The complainants in the above stated causes are property owners in the town of Montclair. The complainant Dinkins owns property adjoining that of the defendants and the complainant Ellis owns property on Myrtle avenue in Montclair, and opposite, or nearly so, to that owned by the defendants. The material allegations in the two bills of complaint are so nearly identical as to require but one statement. These allegations are to the effect that on May 10th, 1921, the town of Montclair adopted a zoning ordinance by the terms of which the defendants’ property was placed in what is…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Welton v. 40 East Oak St. Bldg. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
  2. Schultze v. WilsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  3. Yanow v. Seven Oaks Park, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API