Legal Opinion

Vroman v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 7, 1959No. 396-57PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAHY, Circuit Judge,

sitting by designation.

This is an action by a wife and her husband for just compensation claimed to be due by the United States for the taking of avigation easements over their land, consisting of two contiguous twenty acre tracts, referred to as the East and West tracts. 1 The land lies directly across a highway from the northeast-southwest runway of a military airfield in Yuma County, Arizona, operated by the United States Air Force.

Defendant acquiesces in the Commissioner’s finding and conclusion that an avigation easement was taken over the East tract and that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Highland Park, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  3. Ferrell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1914
  4. Berry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lacey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  2. Martin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  3. Sally Saunders Toles, Elyse Saunders Patterson and Sue Saunders Graham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
  4. Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  5. Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API